Predsednik Narodne skupštine Republike Srbije Ivica Dačić sazvao je Jedanaesti redovni sastanak Kolegijuma Narodne skupštine Dvanaestog saziva za utorak, 29. decembar, sa početkom u 9 časova.

The constant violation of all ethical norms during the discussion of the Code passed this time as well without the interference of the Speaker. In the new episode of #CoupletChorusRebuttals listen how did the MPs  understand the Code.

The Code of Conduct for MPs, which has been adopted by the Assembly this week, stipulates that, while appearing in public, an MP must tell the truth, be fair, honest and responsible, must not use hate speech and must not insult anyone. How did the MPs of the current convocation understand the Code they voted on? From their discussion, it can be concluded that it was a way to send in advance a message to the current non-parliamentary opposition that, if they ever cross the threshold again and enter the parliamentary benches, the ruling majority will decide how the opposition can speak and behave. But the Code could have prevented much more, could it not? 

“Both the physical assault on the then Speaker of the Assembly, Ms. Maja Gojković, and the physical assault on the MPs, the physical assault on the Speaker of the then Administrative Committee, Aleksandar Martinović, at the session of the Administrative Committee, the physical assault on his colleague Marjan Rističević. Remember bringing stones to the National Assembly, remember bringing guitars.“

“Would this Code have helped us against, let’s say, Balša, Kena, and that guy Aleksić, not to mention all the others? I believe it wouldn’t have, but there would have been at least some kind of public condemnation.“

“And about how they hit and how they beat up the MPs when the cameras were turned off, it was like in cowboy films, the door closes and the lights go out, and then a melee.“ 

“We also used to see stones in the National Assembly here, some MPs brought various other props, such as flags of foreign countries, some hit the door of the Parliament with the state flag. A very bad image was shown to the world and this is why we wish to pass this Code and prevent these situations from ever happening again.“

“I spoke at the last session about the fact that Dragan Đilas was the inspirer of all those misdeeds and all those monstrous calls for the liquidation of the President of the Republic and his family, for the rape of his daughter and for abuse of his sons. You can’t imagine how far Dragan Đilas’s sick imagination can go.“

The constant violation of all ethical norms during the discussion of the Code and this time without the interference of the Speaker, brought another seemingly good intention to absurdity. And what the idea is, in fact, was revealed by the Speaker of the Assembly, Ivica Dačić.

 “We didn’t have to do this this fast. We scheduled it because we had received negative comments from some international organisations; it turns out that we do not address that issue. If so, here we have shown that we are committed to the issue.“

At the same session, the MPs once again postponed the introduction of the topic of pay grades for employees in state institutions, which had been announced since 2015, this time the reason for postponement was the Covid pandemic.

For the Open Parliament, Mirjana Nikolić.

The Open Parliament demands the withdrawal of the draft Code of Conduct for MPs from the procedure because it threatens to become another means of settling scores with political dissidents, instead of an instrument that would strengthen parliamentary integrity, rule of law and citizens’ trust. If such a text of the Code is adopted, it will not serve the fight against corruption and protection of the public interest. 

An analysis of the current draft Code, carried out by the CRTA’s Open Parliament initiative team, shows that there is a lack of compliance with international standards in comparison to the 2014 draft, as well as that key provisions that would contribute to the substantial implementation of the Code and change the MPs’ behaviour have been omitted. 

In relation to the draft from 2014, the one that has entered the parliamentary procedure now does not envisage that the Ethics Council, a body consisting of MPs from several committees and at least one representative of the opposition, be responsible for the implementation of the Code, but it is now proposed that the Administrative Committee be in charge of it. Moreover, the possibility is introduced that the complainant will be liable for a violation of the Code, if the Committee finds that the application is unfounded and aimed at political discrediting of another MP. The criteria for determining unfoundedness and intent to discredit a politician remain undefined, leaving room for discretionary interpretation and abuse in order to deal with political opponents. In the draft that is on the agenda from today on, the punishment in the form of a public apology made by an MP was excluded, as well as the obligation to inform the public about the decisions and penalties at the plenary session.

It remains unknown how this version of the Code lost exactly what were the standards of international organisations with which Serbia cooperates, such as the OSCE and the Council of Europe, and it is not known when and how the Working Group changed the draft from 2014 nor whom it consulted. 

The Open Parliament Initiative, launched by the CRTA in 2012, collects and publishes data on the activities of MPs, the activities and results of the work of the National Assembly and deals with analyses of various processes from the perspective of transparency, accountability and participation.

Neprestano kršenje etičkih normi tokom rasprave o Kodeksu i ovoga puta prošli su bez intervencije predsedavajućeg. U novoj epizodi #StrofaRefrenReplika poslušajte kako su poslanici razumeli Kodeks ponašanja.

Kodeks ponašanja narodnih poslanika koji je ove nedelje usvojen u skupštini, propisuje da u javnom nastupu narodni poslanik treba da govori istinu, da bude pravedan, pošten i odgovoran, da se ne služi govorom mržnje i nikog ne vređa. Kako su poslanici aktuelnog saziva razumeli taj Kodeks o kojem su glasali? Iz njihove rasprave reklo bi se kao način da sadašnjoj  vanparlamentarnoj  opoziciji  unapred pošalju poruku da će, ukoliko ikad ponovo pređu cenzus i uđu u skupštinske klupe, vladajuća većina odlučivati o tome kako opozicija sme da govori i da se ponaša. A šta je sve Kodeks mogao da spreči? 

„I fizički napad na tadašnjeg predsednika skupštine gospođu Maju Gojković i fizički napad na narodne poslanike, fizički napad na predsednika tada Administrativnog odbora Aleksandra Martinovića na sednici administrativnog odbora, fizički napad na kolegu Marjana Rističevića,  setite se unošenja kamena u Narodnu skupštinu, setite se unošenja gitara.“

„Da li bi nam pomogao ovaj Kodeks protiv recimo Balše, Kene, onog Aleksića i da ne nabrajam druge? Ja verujem da ne bi, ali bar bi imao neku osudu javnosti.“

„A o tome kako su tukli i kako su premlaćivali poslanike kad se isključe kamere, dakle kao u kaubojskim filmovima, zatvore se vrata pogase se svetla pa ko koga stigne“. 

„Viđali smo ovde i kamenje u Narodnoj skupštini, neki poslanici su unosili i raznorazne druge rekvizite zastave stranih država, neki su udarali u vrata parlamenta državnom zastavom, imali smo zaista jednu lošu sliku koja je odavde išla u svet i zato upravo ovim Kodeksom želimo da sprečimo da u narednom periodu imamo ikad više takve situacije.“

„Govorio sam na prošloj sednici o tome da je upravo Dragan Đilas inspirator svih tih nedela, svih tih monstruoznih poziva na likvidaciju predsednika Republike i njegove porodice, na silovanje njegove ćerke na iživljavanje nad sinovima. Ne možete da zamislite dokle bolesna mašta Dragana Đilasa može da dospe.“

Neprestano kršenje svih etičkih normi tokom same rasprave o Kodeksu i ovoga puta bez uplitanja predsedavajućeg, još jednu na oko dobru nameru dovelo je do apsurda. A šta je u stvari ideja otkrio je predsednik Skupštine Ivica Dačić.

 „Mi ovo nismo morali da uradimo ovako brzo. Mi smo to zakazali zato što smo imali negativne komentare od strane nekih međunarodnih organizacija, ispada da mi se ne posvećujemo tom pitanju. Ako je to tako, evo pokazali smo da se mi posvećujemo tom pitanju.“

Poslanici su na istoj sednici još jednom odložili uvođenje platnih razreda za zaposlene u državnim institucijama koje je najavljivano još od 2015. godine, ovoga puta zbog pandemije kovida.

Za Otvoreni parlament Mirjana Nikolić.

Predsednik Narodne skupštine Ivica Dačić sazvao je Devetu sednicu Drugog redovnog zasedanja Narodne skupštine Republike Srbije u 2020. godini, za nedelju, 27. decembar 2020. godine, sa početkom u 10.00 časova.

Otvoreni parlament zahteva povlačenje predloga Kodeksa ponašanja narodnih poslanika iz procedure jer preti da postane još jedno sredstvo za obračun sa političkim neistomišljenicima, umesto instrument koji bi jačao parlamentarni integritet, vladavinu prava i poverenje građana. Ukoliko ovakav tekst Kodeksa bude usvojen, on neće poslužiti borbi protiv korupcije i zaštiti javnog interesa.

Analiza aktuelnog predloga Kodeksa, koju je uradio tim Crtine inicijative Otvoreni parlament, pokazuje da nedostaje usklađenost sa međunarodnim standardima u poređenju sa predlogom iz 2014. godine, kao i da su izbačene ključne odredbe koje bi doprinele suštinskoj primeni Kodeksa i promeni ponašanja poslanika.

U odnosu na nacrt iz 2014. godine, predlog koji je ušao u skupštinsku preceduru ne predviđa da je za sprovođenje Kodeksa odgovoran Etički savet, telo koje bi činili poslanici iz više odbora i najmanje jedan predstavnik opozicije, već je sada predloženo da se o tome stara Administrativni odbor. Dodatno, uvodi se mogućnost da podnosilac prijave odgovara za kršenje Kodeksa, ukoliko Odbor utvrdi da je prijava neosnovana i usmerena ka političkoj diskreditaciji drugog poslanika. Kriterijumi za utvrđivanje neosnovanosti i namere za političku diskreditaciju ostaju nedefinisani, što ostavlja prostor za diskreciono tumačenje i zloupotrebe u cilju obračunavanja sa političkim protivnicima. U predlogu koji je od danas na dnevnom redu, izbačena je kazna u vidu javnog izvinjenja poslanika, kao i obaveza obaveštavanja javnosti o odlukama i kaznama na plenarnoj sednici.

Nejasno je kako je ova verzija Kodeksa izgubila upravo ono što su bili standardi međunarodnih organizacija sa kojima Srbija sarađuje, poput OEBS-a i Saveta Evrope, a nije poznato ni kada je i kako Radna grupa menjala nacrt iz 2014. godine i koga je pritom konsultovala.

Inicijativa Otvoreni parlament, koju je pokrenula Crta 2012. godine, prikuplja i objavljuje podatke o aktivnostima narodnih poslanika,  radu i rezultatima rada Narodne skupštine i izrađuje analize različitih procesa iz perspektive transparentnosti, odgovornosti i participativnosti.

How the police will seize illegally acquired bitcoins, why the former members of the regime did not invest even in the toilets and who wants our region to swim in blood? Look up answers in the new episode of #CoupletChorusRebuttals.

Twenty items on the agenda fit in three days of discussion, a little bit of tax and finances, a little bit of regional relationships, a little bit of criticism towards the opposition. Explaining the benefits of the agreement with Albania on crossing the border with an ID card, the Minister of the Interior Aleksandar Vulin sets the topic “Balkans to Balkanians”

“Only those who do not believe in the strength of Serbia, in the strength of the Serbian people, can be afraid of our opening and of faster flow of people and capital. President Aleksandar Vučić had the courage to say – the Balkans to the Balkanians, and I ask you to support that sentence and convey to all citizens of Serbia that this is actually good news.“

Some MPs understood this slogan as an invitation to investors, the others criticised the western world. Aleksandar Mirković, Milenko Jovanov, and Ljiljana Malušić.

“It seems to me that the Balkans to the Balkanians, as the President, Aleksandar Vučić, said, has finally given us the opportunity to decide and apply together for all foreign investments in order to raise the quality of life in our countries to a higher level.“ 

“Nothing has changed, ladies and gentlemen, since Bismarck’s famous sentence that the whole Balkans is not worth as much as the bones of a Pomeranian soldier. That’s how they all see us. Now the key question, for all of us, especially for the younger generations, is whether we will continue to be fools who constantly stumble over the same stone, or will we finally learn lessons from our painful and blood-soaked past.“

 “Why am I talking about the ‘Mini-Schengen’? Because the point of the story is to connect the region. There was enough blood, there was enough war. Precisely European Union, I’m not saying all of them, but most of them, want something to happen here, they want us to swim in blood. Well, that’s enough. Whoever wants a war, may the war be in their house. Nevermore, people. Nevermore.“

And in the debate on new currencies, there were those who admitted that they did not know what they were supposed to vote for. Let us hear the question asked by Dragan Marković Palma, part of the answer of Minister Siniša Mali and the conclusion made by Ivica Dačić.

“What is a bitcoin? Whose money is that? What does it mean that he buys a machine and digs and now, I don’t know, he earns this much, that much.“

“These are cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin is the most famous. There are several of these cryptocurrencies and they said ‘let’s use this bitcoin as a means of payment’ and they found enough people, a critical mass of people who accepted it.“

“I know that this is quite complicated, because I’ve just asked Minister Vulin how the police will seize illegally acquired bitcoins, but we are already entering into metaphysical discussions, and that is not on our today’s agenda.“

At this session, there were also terrible criticisms of the opposition, but this time we have chosen an amusing one: Luka Kebara.

“For decades, our dream has been a normal toilet with a functional, let’s say, toilet, that is, toilet paper, soap. It was an abstract notion. Those members of that former tycoon regime, that Đilas, that Jeremić, that Tadić, they did not invest even in the most basic things, let alone procure some modern IT systems, computer equipment, network equipment and so on.”

For the Open Parliament, Mirjana Nikolić.

Predsednik Narodne skupštine Republike Srbije Ivica Dačić sazvao je Deseti redovni sastanak Kolegijuma Narodne skupštine Dvanaestog saziva za utorak, 22. decembar, sa početkom u 9 časova.

Kako će policija da zapleni nelegalno stečene bitkoine, zašto bivši režim nije ulagao u toalete i ko želi da naš region pliva u krvi? Odgovore potražite u novoj epizodi #StrofaRefrenReplika.

Dvadeset tačaka dnevnog reda stalo je u tri dana rasprave, red poreza i finansija, red regionalnih odnosa, pa red kritike opozicije. U objašnjenju benefita od sporazuma sa Albanijom o prelasku granice sa ličnom kartom ministar unutrašnjih poslova Aleksandar Vulin zadaje temu „Balkan Balkancima“.

„Samo onaj ko ne veruje u snagu Srbije, u snagu srpskog naroda, može da se plaši našeg otvaranja i bržeg protoka ljudi i kapitala. Predsednik Aleksandar Vučić je imao hrabrosti da kaže – Balkan Balkancima, a ja molim vas da tu rečenicu podržite i prenesete svim građanima Srbije da je ovo dobra vest.“

Neki poslanici su ovu parolu razumeli kao poziv investitorima, u diskusijama drugih kritike na račun zapada. Aleksandar Mirković, Milenko Jovanov, pa Ljiljana Malušić.

„Čini mi se da Balkan Balkancima, to što je rekao i predsednik, Aleksandar Vučić, konačno sada mi možemo biti u prilici da odlučujemo i da zajedno apliciramo ka svim stranim investitorima kako bi kvalitet života u našim zemljama podigli na viši novo.“ 

„Ništa se nije promenilo, dame i gospodo, od one čuvene Bizmarkove rečenice da ne vredi ceo Balkan koliko kosti jednog pomeranskog vojnika. Tako nas sve zajedno doživljavaju. Sad je ključno pitanje, za sve nas, posebno za mlađe generacije, da li ćemo i dalje da budemo budale koje stalno spotiču o isti kamen, ili ćemo konačno da izvučemo pouke iz svoje bolne i krvave prošlosti“.

 „Zašto govorim o Malom Šengenu? Jer je poenta priče povezivanje regiona. Dosta je bilo krvi, dosta je bilo ratova. Upravo ta Evropska unija, ne kažem svi, ali većina želi da se ovde nešto dešava, da mi plivamo u krvi. Pa, dosta je bilo. Ko rat želi, rat mu bio u kući. Nikada više. Ljudi, nikada više.“

A u raspravi o novim valutama, bilo je i onih koji su priznali da ne znaju o čemu treba da glasaju. Slušamo pitanje Dragana Markovića Palme, deo odgovora ministra Siniše Malog i zaključak Ivice Dačića.

„Šta je bitkoin? Čije su to pare? Kako to kupi mašinu i kopa i sad, ne znam, zarađuje ovoliko, onoliko“.

„To su kripto valute. Bitkoin je najpoznatiji. Imate više tih kripto valuta i rekli su hajmo da iskoristimo ovaj bitkoin kao sredstvo plaćanja i našli su dovoljno ljudi, kritičnu masu ljudi koja je to prihvatila.“

„Ja znam da je ovo dosta komplikovano, jer malopre sam pitao ministra Vulina kako će policija da zapleni nelegalno stečene bitkoine, ali to je sada već ulazimo u metafizičke rasprave, a to nije danas na dnevnom redu“

Bilo je i na ovoj sednici strašnih kritika na račun opozicije, mi smo ovog puta odabrali jednu zabavnu. Luka Kebara.

„Nama je višedecenijski san normalni toalet sa funkcionalnim, da kažem, toaletom, odnosno VC papirom, sapunom. To je bila misaona imenica. Ti pripadnici tog bivšeg tajkunskog režima, taj Đilas, taj Jeremić, taj Tadić, oni nisu najosnovnije ulagali, a kamoli da su nabavljali nekakve moderne IT sisteme, računarsku opremu, mrežnu opremu i ostalo.”

Za Otvoreni parlament Mirjana Nikolić.

Predsednik Narodne skupštine Republike Srbije Ivica Dačić sazvao je Drugu posebnu sednicu Narodne skupštine Republike Srbije u Dvanaestom sazivu, za subotu, 26. decembar 2020. godine, sa početkom u 10.00 časova.